BFSI
Treasury & Finance
NIM compression, funding-cost shifts, and branch profitability gaps are usually diagnosed after the quarter closes, when the finance team builds a manual bridge across general ledger, treasury, and branch data to explain what already happened.
FireAI keeps that bridge live — decomposing NIM by driver, tracking cost of funds against yield continuously, and reconciling branch P&L against the general ledger — so treasury and finance leaders can see a compression trend developing instead of explaining it after the fact.
Net Interest Margin (NIM) Decomposition
NIM compression shows up as a single number at quarter-close, and figuring out whether it's a funding-cost problem, a yield problem, or a mix-shift problem usually takes the finance team several days of manual bridge-building across product and branch data.
FireAI decomposes NIM movement into its underlying drivers — funding cost, yield, and portfolio mix — at the branch and product level, continuously, so the quarterly bridge is a query instead of a multi-day exercise.
NIM Decomposition Dashboard
Cost of Funds vs Yield Analysis
Cost of funds and portfolio yield move for different reasons and on different timelines, but they're often reviewed together only in a single quarterly finance deck, which makes it hard to react to a funding-side shift while it's happening.
FireAI tracks cost of funds by funding source and portfolio yield by product continuously, so treasury can see a repricing shift or a yield drag as it develops rather than at the next scheduled review.
Ask FireAI about Cost of Funds
See how your team can ask questions in plain language and get instant analytics answers.
Liquidity Coverage & ALM Gap Tracking
Asset-liability mismatch across maturity buckets is typically reviewed at a scheduled ALCO meeting, using a static snapshot that can be several days old by the time it's discussed.
FireAI maintains a continuously updated maturity-bucket view of assets and liabilities, flagging buckets where the gap is widening beyond policy limits ahead of the next ALCO cycle.
Branch P&L Reconciliation
Branch-level P&L is usually assembled by allocating central costs and income across branches using a manual allocation model, which makes month-end branch profitability reporting slow and prone to reconciliation disputes between branch and central finance.
FireAI automates branch P&L reconciliation against the general ledger using your existing allocation rules, flagging branches where reported and reconciled numbers diverge before the report goes out.
Frequently asked questions
FireAI uses your general ledger's interest income and expense data, broken down by product and funding source, to attribute NIM movement to funding cost, yield, and mix-shift components — the underlying formula follows standard treasury methodology, not a proprietary model.
Yes — access is role-scoped, so treasury sees the consolidated NIM and ALM view while branch finance teams see their own branch's P&L reconciliation.
No — FireAI provides a continuously updated data layer that feeds into your existing ALCO process; it doesn't replace the committee's governance or decision-making role.